SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

சிறுமியிடம் கரு முட்டை எடுத்து விற்பனை வழக்கு mhc order

Uncategorized

சிறுமியிடம் கரு முட்டை எடுத்து விற்பனை வழக்கு mhc order

சிறுமியிடம் கரு முட்டை எடுத்து விற்பனை செய்ததாக ஈரோடு மருத்துவமனையின் உள்ள ஸ்கேன் உள்ளிட்ட உபகரணங்களுக்கு வைக்கப்பட்ட சீலை அகற்ற சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. ஈரோட்டில் 16 வயது சிறுமியிடம் பல முறை கருமுட்டை எடுக்கப்பட்டு விற்பனை செய்த விவகாரத்தில், ஈரோட்டில் உள்ள தனியார் மருத்துவமனை...

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN W. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014and W.M.P.No.11454 of 2017 W.P(MD)No.32765 of 2014 is partly allowed by directing the first respondent to pay the compensation amount of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) to the petitioner at 6% interest per annum from the date of filing this petition till the date of this order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Failure to pay the amount within three months would invite payment of interest at 12% per annum from the date of the order till the date of payment on the compensation amount of Rs.15,00,000/- plus interest amount calculated at 6% per annum from the date of this petition till the date of

Uncategorized

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN W. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014and W.M.P.No.11454 of 2017 W.P(MD)No.32765 of 2014 is partly allowed by directing the first respondent to pay the compensation amount of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) to the petitioner at 6% interest per annum from the date of filing this petition till the date of this order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Failure to pay the amount within three months would invite payment of interest at 12% per annum from the date of the order till the date of payment on the compensation amount of Rs.15,00,000/- plus interest amount calculated at 6% per annum from the date of this petition till the date of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders reserved on 21.04.2022 Orders pronounced on 20.07.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN W. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014and W.M.P.No.11454 of 2017 Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in...

O.P.No.633 of 2021 & O.A.No.627 of 2021 & A.No.3534 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J In the light of the above, the order dated 08.07.2022 is modified accordingly. It is made clear that when the applicant/husband visits the residence of the respondent/wife to see his child and spend time with him, the respondent/wife is directed to receive him and allow him to spend time with his child without any inconvenience. Further, the respondent/wife is directed to show hospitality by providing snacks and dinner, etc., to him and have the same along with her child, which means husband, wife and children altogether and create a healthy atmosphere so that the child should feel happy and enjoy the moments by spending with his parents. 17. Post on 29.07.2022. 13.07.2022 suk/arr

Uncategorized

O.P.No.633 of 2021 & O.A.No.627 of 2021 & A.No.3534 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J In the light of the above, the order dated 08.07.2022 is modified accordingly. It is made clear that when the applicant/husband visits the residence of the respondent/wife to see his child and spend time with him, the respondent/wife is directed to receive him and allow him to spend time with his child without any inconvenience. Further, the respondent/wife is directed to show hospitality by providing snacks and dinner, etc., to him and have the same along with her child, which means husband, wife and children altogether and create a healthy atmosphere so that the child should feel happy and enjoy the moments by spending with his parents. 17. Post on 29.07.2022. 13.07.2022 suk/arr

O.P.No.633 of 2021 & O.A.No.627 of 2021 & A.No.3534 of 2021 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J This Court vide order dated 08.07.2022, has permitted the applicant/father to take the minor child to his residence from the respondent/wife’s...

Susiganesan case mhcகவிஞர் லீனாமணிமேகலை மீது வழக்குகள் நிலுவையில் இருப்பதால் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் சம்மன் அனுப்பினால் கூட ஆஜராகமாட்டார் என இயக்குனர் சுசி கணேசன் தரப்பில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது

Uncategorized

Susiganesan case mhcகவிஞர் லீனாமணிமேகலை மீது வழக்குகள் நிலுவையில் இருப்பதால் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் சம்மன் அனுப்பினால் கூட ஆஜராகமாட்டார் என இயக்குனர் சுசி கணேசன் தரப்பில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது

கவிஞர் லீனாமணிமேகலை மீது வழக்குகள் நிலுவையில் இருப்பதால் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் சம்மன் அனுப்பினால் கூட ஆஜராகமாட்டார் என இயக்குனர் சுசி கணேசன் தரப்பில் தெரிவிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது நடிகைகள், பாடகிகள் என சினிமா பிரபலங்கள் தங்கள் மீதான பாலியல் தொந்தரவுகள் குறித்து கடந்த 2018ஆம் ஆண்டு ‘‘மீ டூ’’ ஹேஷ்டேக்...

Full order of admk lock and seal case HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR 1. Crl.O.P.No.16343 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9425 and 9427 of 2022, 2.Crl.O.P.No.16485 of 2022 and 3. Crl.O.P.No.16695 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9799 and 9800 of 2022 Crl.O.P.Nos.16343 and 16695 of 2022 Edappadi K. Palaniswamy M/a 67 years Interim General Secretary & Party Headquarters Secretary, All India Anna Dravita Munnetra Kazatam Puratchi Thalaivar MGR Maaligai 226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600014. .. Petitioner ~Vs~ 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cumfull

Uncategorized

Full order of admk lock and seal case HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR 1. Crl.O.P.No.16343 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9425 and 9427 of 2022, 2.Crl.O.P.No.16485 of 2022 and 3. Crl.O.P.No.16695 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9799 and 9800 of 2022 Crl.O.P.Nos.16343 and 16695 of 2022 Edappadi K. Palaniswamy M/a 67 years Interim General Secretary & Party Headquarters Secretary, All India Anna Dravita Munnetra Kazatam Puratchi Thalaivar MGR Maaligai 226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600014. .. Petitioner ~Vs~ 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cumfull

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Delivered on 15~07~2022 20~07~2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR 1. Crl.O.P.No.16343 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9425 and 9427 of 2022, 2.Crl.O.P.No.16485 of 2022 and...

Crl.M.P.No.3335 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.90 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. This is an appeal against an acquittal filed by the. //// The Advocate Commissioner and the appropriate Forensic Expert shall complete the exercise and submit a report within a period of three months there from; (vii) Upon receipt of the report, the learned Magistrate shall forward the same to this Court accordingly. 9. Call the main appeal after the receipt of the report from the Trial Court. 19.07.2022 grs  D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J

Uncategorized

Crl.M.P.No.3335 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.90 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. This is an appeal against an acquittal filed by the. //// The Advocate Commissioner and the appropriate Forensic Expert shall complete the exercise and submit a report within a period of three months there from; (vii) Upon receipt of the report, the learned Magistrate shall forward the same to this Court accordingly. 9. Call the main appeal after the receipt of the report from the Trial Court. 19.07.2022 grs  D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J

Crl.M.P.No.3335 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.90 of 2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. This is an appeal against an acquittal filed by the petitioner/complainant. The complaint is alleging an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

The appellant’s husband, namely Venkatesan, shall also execute a bond standing as surety ensuring the compliance of the above mentioned undertaking by the appellant; 9. The Criminal Appeal is partly allowed accordingly. 14.07.2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JHON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.718 of 2019 Sathiya … Appellant Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, For Appellant : Mr.R.Jothi for Mr.P.Rathanavel For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) JUDGMENT

Uncategorized

The appellant’s husband, namely Venkatesan, shall also execute a bond standing as surety ensuring the compliance of the above mentioned undertaking by the appellant; 9. The Criminal Appeal is partly allowed accordingly. 14.07.2022 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JHON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.718 of 2019 Sathiya … Appellant Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, For Appellant : Mr.R.Jothi for Mr.P.Rathanavel For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.07.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.No.718 of 2019 Sathiya … Appellant Versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ponnai Circle,...

Actor sivaji sons senior adv p r raman arguments

Uncategorized

Actor sivaji sons senior adv p r raman arguments

நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் எழுதி வைத்த உயில் ஜோடிக்கப்பட்டது என்ற குற்றச்சாட்டு தவறானது என பாகப்பிரிவினை கோரிய வழக்கில் நடிகர்கள் ராம்குமார், பிரபு தரப்பில் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வாதம் முன்வைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது. நடிகர் சிவாஜி கணேசன் மரணத்துக்குப் பின், அவருக்கு சொந்தமான 270 கோடி ரூபாய் சொத்துக்களை முறையாக...

15.In the light of the legal proposition enunciated above, this court is of the opinion that the notices issued by the fourth respondent are not hit by limitation. Thus, there is no reason to interfere with the findings so rendered by the CESTAT. 16.In the result, both the writ petitions fail and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) For Petitioner : Mr. J. Sivanandaraaj in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. T. Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER R. MAHADEVAN, J.

Uncategorized

15.In the light of the legal proposition enunciated above, this court is of the opinion that the notices issued by the fourth respondent are not hit by limitation. Thus, there is no reason to interfere with the findings so rendered by the CESTAT. 16.In the result, both the writ petitions fail and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.) For Petitioner : Mr. J. Sivanandaraaj in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. T. Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER R. MAHADEVAN, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 30.06.2022 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition Nos. 34308 & 34309 of 2004...

16.Accordingly, the order of the learned Judge dated 29.04.2011 passed in the writ petitions is set aside and these appeals are allowed as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 30.06.2022. HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 823 to 830 of 2016 and CMP.Nos.10731 to 10738 of 2016 WA No. 823 of 2016 1. Director General of Foreign Trade Government of India f 2001. For Appellants : Mr. Sankara Narayanan, ASGI assisted by Mr.Venkatasamy Babu in all the writ appeals For R1 : Mr.A.Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan in all the writ appeals COMMON JUDGMENT R. MAHADEVAN, J.

Uncategorized

16.Accordingly, the order of the learned Judge dated 29.04.2011 passed in the writ petitions is set aside and these appeals are allowed as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 30.06.2022. HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 823 to 830 of 2016 and CMP.Nos.10731 to 10738 of 2016 WA No. 823 of 2016 1. Director General of Foreign Trade Government of India f 2001. For Appellants : Mr. Sankara Narayanan, ASGI assisted by Mr.Venkatasamy Babu in all the writ appeals For R1 : Mr.A.Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan in all the writ appeals COMMON JUDGMENT R. MAHADEVAN, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.06.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Appeal Nos. 823 to 830 of 2016...