SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Pandiyarajan Son: Wrong news by you. Since we challenged interim order court directed us to challenge the final order afresh with same grounds [10/17, 06:20] Sekarreporter 1: 1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 15849-15851/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-09-2022 in WAMD No. 973/2022, WAMD No. 977/2022 and WAMD No. 980/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras At Madurai) TAMILNADU SPINNING MILLS ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s)

by ·

[10/16, 13:55] Pandiyarajan Son: 👆🏻Wrong news by you. Since we challenged interim order court directed us to challenge the final order afresh with same grounds
[10/17, 06:20] Sekarreporter 1: 1
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 15849-15851/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-09-2022 in WAMD No. 973/2022, WAMD No. 977/2022 and WAMD No. 980/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras At Madurai) TAMILNADU SPINNING MILLS ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ANR.Respondent(s)
(IA No. 133117/2022 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 135253/2022 – PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No. 135251/2022 – STAY APPLICATION)
Date : 14-10-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Anil Kaushik, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Rana, Adv.
Ms. Anju Kaushik, Adv.
Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. D.Kumanan, AOR Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Sheikh F. Kalia, Adv.
Mr. P. Wilson, Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Nedumaran, AOR
Mr. Apoorv Malhotra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The final order having passed, the interim order merges with the final order and thus does not require any interference by us.
2
The special leave petitions are dismissed on that ground alone.
Needless to say that this does not preclude the petitioner from assailing the final order which is stated to have been already passed.
We however, have cautioned the respondents that if the appointment does not take place in the time specified, the only sequitur is that the functioning of the Commission will be brought to a standstill.
Liberty to move an application in case the appointment is not made.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID]
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

You may also like...