You may also like...
-
The Honourable Mr.Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice C.SARAVANAN H.C.P.No.1884 of 2022 Mrs.Karthika “6. It is quite often said that behind every successful man, there is a woman and according to me, it is not a single woman, but women, namely, mother and wife, who are two eyes of a man. In a family, wife is a root and husband is a trunk and other members of a family are branches. If the root is damaged, the entire family will get ruined. It is also equally important for a man to provide a sense of safety and security to his better half, who joined hands with a lot of expectations. Though this Court is not a fact finding authority to examine as to who is at fault, in my view, the petitioner must have thrown all her egos for the welfare of her children, instead of foisting cases on the 4th respondent one after the other.”
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 18, 2022
-
பொன்முடி வழக்கு next week adj navj.[9/7, 15:20] sekarreporter1: Justice Anand Venkatesh: According to me, the administrative order passed is ex facie illegal. If that’s illegal, then everything that happened after that will also have to tested. #MadrasHC #Ponmudy [9/7, 15:20] sekarreporter1: Luthra: The observations in the order have predetermined an issue which could be done only after having been posted for hearing. If your lordships observations are predetermined, then that becomes final. Can revisional jurisdiction do that without hearing the parties? #MadrasHC #Ponmudy [9/7, 15:21] sekarreporter1: Senior Advocates Luthra, NR Elango, AAG Amit Anand Tiwari appear for the respondents. #MadrasHC #Ponmudy [9/7, 15:27] sekarreporter1: பொன்முடி வழக்கு next week adj navj
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 7, 2023
-
25.At this juncture, this Court observes that the suo motu revisions initiated over the past few weeks have been looked upon in some quarters as a sort of witch hunt spearheaded by one Judge of the High Court. It is, therefore, necessary to remind all concerned that thesesuo motu revisions have been exercised not by one Judge but by the High Court, as an institution, to ensure that the streams of criminal justice are not subverted and remain pure and unsullied. The orders of the High Court resonate the voice of not any individual judge but one institution. In other words, decision-making by the High Court is an institutional action and not the action of any particular judge. This is in keeping with the role of the High Court as a constitutional court vested with the power of judicial and administrative superintendence over the courts subordinate to it. 26.Having thus rejected the plea for recusal and the preliminary contentions raised on behalf of the State and the accused, the Court must now decide the next course of action. Having regard to the issues raised this Court is of the view that submissions on either side are likely to take up some time. Given the fact that a fresh roster will come into effect from the first week of October, these matters can be taken up and heard at length once the next roster is notified by the Court. The Registry is directed to list the matter on 09.10.2023 at 2:15 pm for arguments. 14.09.2023 KP Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order . To 1.The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Wing Viluppuram. 2.The Principal District Court Vellore. 3.Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. N.ANAND VENKATESH., J. KP SUO MOTU Crl.R.C.No.1419 of 2023 14.09.2023 .
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 14, 2023