Sathis Sunder MHC advocate : Validity of the various sections of pmla which was challenged in supreme court..upheld.The apex court has ruled that power of seizure, attachment, arrest under s.17,5 & 19 are concomitant to the objectives of the act to curb projection of proceeds of crime to be untainted.S.24 shifting burden of proof on

[7/28, 07:04] Sathis Sunder MHC advocate : Validity of the various sections of pmla which was challenged in supreme court..upheld.The apex court has ruled that power of seizure, attachment, arrest under s.17,5 & 19 are concomitant to the objectives of the act to curb projection of proceeds of crime to be untainted.S.24 shifting burden of proof on person charged also upheld and not contrary to constitutional rights or opposed to criminal jurisprudence.power of grant of bail under s.45 hedged with twin conditions reiterated.benefit of s.436A crpc to be extended to undetrials under pmla..no considered findings on retorpectivity. Only saving grace is that the court has ruled that accquittal in schedule offence or quashment by competent court will lead to dropping of proceedings under pmla.Court has also held that there is no mandate for supply of ecir to person charged ..though it is held that complaint is a must to be made known for exercising power of arrest.Ed manual is an internal document for guidance of officers and not the last word on the subject..supreme court has disposed of all the petitions laying down the law on basis of which the pending matters are to be dealt with.
[7/28, 07:06] Sekarreporter1: 🌹🌹

[7/28, 07:04] Sathis Sunder MHC advocate : Validity of the various sections of pmla which was challenged in supreme court..upheld.The apex court has ruled that power of seizure, attachment, arrest under s.17,5 & 19 are concomitant to the objectives of the act to curb projection of proceeds of crime to be untainted.S.24 shifting burden of proof on person charged also upheld and not contrary to constitutional rights or opposed to criminal jurisprudence.power of grant of bail under s.45 hedged with twin conditions reiterated.benefit of s.436A crpc to be extended to undetrials under pmla..no considered findings on retorpectivity. Only saving grace is that the court has ruled that accquittal in schedule offence or quashment by competent court will lead to dropping of proceedings under pmla.Court has also held that there is no mandate for supply of ecir to person charged ..though it is held that complaint is a must to be made known for exercising power of arrest.Ed manual is an internal document for guidance of officers and not the last word on the subject..supreme court has disposed of all the petitions laying down the law on basis of which the pending matters are to be dealt with.
[7/28, 07:06] Sekarreporter1:

[7/28, 07:04] Sathis Sunder MHC advocate : Validity of the various sections of pmla which was challenged in supreme court..upheld.The apex court has ruled that power of seizure, attachment, arrest under s.17,5 & 19 are concomitant to the objectives of the act to curb projection of proceeds of crime to be untainted.S.24 shifting burden of proof on person charged also upheld and not contrary to constitutional rights or opposed to criminal jurisprudence.power of grant of bail under s.45 hedged with twin conditions reiterated.benefit of s.436A crpc to be extended to undetrials under pmla..no considered findings on retorpectivity. Only saving grace is that the court has ruled that accquittal in schedule offence or quashment by competent court will lead to dropping of proceedings under pmla.Court has also held that there is no mandate for supply of ecir to person charged ..though it is held that complaint is a must to be made known for exercising power of arrest.Ed manual is an internal document for guidance of officers and not the last word on the subject..supreme court has disposed of all the petitions laying down the law on basis of which the pending matters are to be dealt with.
[7/28, 07:06] Sekarreporter1:

[7/28, 07:04] Sathis Sunder MHC advocate : Validity of the various sections of pmla which was challenged in supreme court..upheld.The apex court has ruled that power of seizure, attachment, arrest under s.17,5 & 19 are concomitant to the objectives of the act to curb projection of proceeds of crime to be untainted.S.24 shifting burden of proof on person charged also upheld and not contrary to constitutional rights or opposed to criminal jurisprudence.power of grant of bail under s.45 hedged with twin conditions reiterated.benefit of s.436A crpc to be extended to undetrials under pmla..no considered findings on retorpectivity. Only saving grace is that the court has ruled that accquittal in schedule offence or quashment by competent court will lead to dropping of proceedings under pmla.Court has also held that there is no mandate for supply of ecir to person charged ..though it is held that complaint is a must to be made known for exercising power of arrest.Ed manual is an internal document for guidance of officers and not the last word on the subject..supreme court has disposed of all the petitions laying down the law on basis of which the pending matters are to be dealt with.
[7/28, 07:06] Sekarreporter1: