You may also like...
-
Order: We direct Registrar General of Madras HC to furnish the following information –
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 3, 2024
-
Accordingly, for the reasons aforesaid, this writ petition is allowed by setting aside the communication dated 9.6.2023 of the respondents to the petitioner and also the consequential order dated 16.6.2023 passed by the respondents in and by which the tomb has been held to be a protected monument, as the same does not satisfy the requirements of protected monument under Sections 2 (a) and (j) r/w Section 3 of the Act. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to take steps to relocate the tomb to any appropriate place, which they deem fit and proper, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 27.06.2023 Index : Yes / No GLN Note to Office : Issue Today To 1. The Secretary Government of India Ministry of Culture New Delhi. 2. The Director General of Archaeology Archaeological Survey of India Dharohar Bhavan, 24, Tilak Marg New Delhi 110 001. 3. The Superintending Archaeologist Archaeological Survey of India Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009. 4. National Monument Authority Ministry of Culture No.24, Tilak Marg, Bhagwan Das Lane Mandi House, New Delhi 110 001. 5. Regional Director (South) ASI & Competent Authority National Monument Authority Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. M.DHANDAPANI, J. GLN PRE-DELIVERY ORDER IN W.P. NO.32163 OF 2022 Pronounced on 27.06.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 30, 2023
-
JUSTICE P.T. ASHA A.No.944 of 2020 in C.S.No.212 of 2017 1.—Therefore a prima facie case for lodging a complaint under Section 340 of the Code has been made out by the applicant. 31. Therefore, directions are issued to the Registrar General, Madras High Court, to initiate the complaint against the respondent.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 7, 2020