Follow:
- Next story The Income Tax department on Wednesday opposed a plea in the Madras High Court by ousted AIADMK leader V K Sasikala seeking relief in a long-pending tax dispute citing the Rs one crore limit for appeals, saying a prosecution is pending before an economic offences court.
- Previous story The reference was made by Justice P N Prakash, who wanted the chief justice to constitute a full bench to decide several questions of law, including whether such appeals can be entertained by sessions courts under Section 372 of CrPC or by the high court under Section 378(4) and (5) of CrPC or whether there are concurrent remedies available with the right to the complainant to elect the forum of their choice.
Recent Posts
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?
More
Recent Posts
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
- முதல்வர் ஸ்டாலின், அமைச்சர் பொன்முடிக்கு எதிரான மேம்பால முறைகேடு தொடர்பான வழக்கை திரும்பப் பெற்று சபாநாயகர் 15 -20 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை எதிர்த்து வழக்கு தொடர முடியுமா
- Today law tips #DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE LAND CLASSIFIED AS “GRAMA NATHAM LAND” IS BELONGED TO THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY?