Today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 105 ; N sumathi & another vs lakshmi vilas bank : In cases where fixed deposit being in joint names of husband and wife , on maturity would be payable to either or survivor[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court
Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 105 ; N sumathi & another vs lakshmi vilas bank : In cases where fixed deposit being in joint names of husband and wife , on maturity would be payable to either or survivor
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 105 ; N sumathi & another vs lakshmi vilas bank : In cases where fixed deposit being in joint names of husband and wife , on maturity would be payable to either or survivor
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) LW 70 : Mohan N vs P govindasami : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 ; limitation for rejection of plaint mixed question of law and facts , can be determined only after taking consideration into the evidences before court
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) DRTC 578 : B Anitha vs punjab national bank , ambur branch ; Bank cannot deny educational loan on ground that academic record at school level was very poor
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 1995 (1) RCR 697 SC : delhi development authority vs skipper construction : Apology tendered by contemners sensing their adventures turned out to be mis adventures , an apology is not a weapon of defence to purge guilt nor it is intended to operate as a universal panacea
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2004 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 838 SC : Zahira habibulla H sheik vs state of gujarat : Accused in a criminal case acquitted due to dishonest investigation and unfair trial , in such a case supreme court should step in to prevent miscarriage of justice
[09/05, 12:50] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) CTC 166 : suyambu Anantham P ( died ) vs sadana gnana selvi : legal services authorities act 1987 sec 20 : Held before making reference to lok adalat , court should put all parties to dispute on notice including parties who have already been set exparte
