Today 5 tips Vinothpandian: 1999(8) SCC 221 : central bank of india vs saxons farms : language of notice ” kindly arrange to make the payment to avoid the unpleasant action of my client ” was sufficient to constitute a clear demand as contemplated under CL(b) of proviso to sec 138 of NI act

[27/05, 11:24] Vinothpandian: 1999(8) SCC 221 : central bank of india vs saxons farms : language of notice ” kindly arrange to make the payment to avoid the unpleasant action of my client ” was sufficient to constitute a clear demand as contemplated under CL(b) of proviso to sec 138 of NI act
[27/05, 11:24] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) SCC 330 : Ajay singh vs state of chattisgarh : judgement announced but not available records can never be a judgement , declaration of result cannot tantamount to a judgement as prescribed in the CRPC
[27/05, 11:24] Vinothpandian: 2016 (7) SCC 221 : subramaniam swamy vs union ministry of law : Right to free speech cannot mean that a citizen can defame the other , protection of reputation is a fundamental right
[27/05, 11:24] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC 342 : Periyasami vs S Nallasamy : Additional accused cannot be summoned under sec 319 of CRPC in casual and cavalier manner in absence of strong and cogent evidence
[27/05, 11:24] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) SCC 245 : Rajesh talwar vs CBI : inconvenience cannot be a valid basis for transfer of criminal proceedings from one court to another under 406 of CRPC