Today 7 Law tipz Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )

[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes SC 225 : sushila agarwal and others vs state ( NCT of Delhi) ; An accused can move application under section 438 CRPC 1973 before FIR is filed or before filing of charge sheet if FIR is registered , court can impose conditions including limited period of anticipatory bail
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) BC 592 : Nihali devi vs state govt of NCT of Delhi: sentence of imprisonment of accused under sec 138 NI act being a woman of 66 years old , her tragic circumstances should have been taken into consideration for condoning delay of 565 days in filing revision
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) supreme 677 : Pradeep Ram vs state of jharkhand: court can direct investigation even after filing of charge sheet ( section 173 CRPC )
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2020 (2) KLT 675 : M/ S Ellora stone Aggregates meenkunnom PO Aarakuzha ,muvattupuzha vs The village officer , Arakuzha village : delay involved in issuing survey map and sketch in respect of a property , non availability of the records cannot be a reason to deny revenue records like survey map and sketch, with the available records or by conducting survey , survey map shall be issued to the petitioner
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) scale 341 : N sankaranaryanan vs The chairman TNHB : private property dispute between the members of one family cannot be allowed to be raised under art 226 / 227 of the constitution of india
[08/07, 11:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (266) DLT 305 : university of delhi vs union of india : In a condonation of delay application , a liberal approach should be taken , however condonation of long delay should not be automatic , therefore routine explanation not enough , sufficient cause has to be shown to justify the delay