Today 8 law tipsVinothpandian: AIR 2001 SC 2306 : central council for research in ayurveda and siddha vs k santha kumari : law laid down by the court on the basis of wrong concession or admission of the counsel does not constitute a binding precedent [11/3, 10:21] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 438 : church of South india trust association tiruchi vs M Ramesh : courts should order substituted service

[11/3, 10:21] Vinothpandian: AIR 2001 SC 2306 : central council for research in ayurveda and siddha vs k santha kumari : law laid down by the court on the basis of wrong concession or admission of the counsel does not constitute a binding precedent
[11/3, 10:21] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 438 : church of South india trust association tiruchi vs M Ramesh : courts should order substituted service only if conditions in order 5 rule 20(1) exists
[11/3, 10:21] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 1079 ; Jayant Verma vs union of India : exparte judgement without any line of reasoning is per incurian and is not binding
[11/3, 10:21] Vinothpandian: 2018(6) CTC 241 : Kusum Lata vs state of UP : Registration act 1908 : Any illegality or irregularity of registered document must be questioned through proceedings before appropriate civil court
[11/3, 10:21] Vinothpandian: 2000(1) SCC 721 : sevak ayat niryat co vs oriental insurance co Ltd : CP act 21 : when the national commission passed the judgement without issuing notice to the complainant ,such a judgement being bad in law is liable to be set aside
[11/3, 10:22] Vinothpandian: 2008(11) SCC 769 : zolba vs keshao : erroneous advice by an advocate is a sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing written statements
[11/3, 10:22] Vinothpandian: AIR 2015 hyd 59 : AP co-op housing socities federation Ltd vs AP consumer disputes redressal commission ‘: An appeal does not lie before the national commission against the orders passed by the state commission in appellate jurisdiction
[11/3, 10:22] Vinothpandian: AIR 2010 Sikkim 32 : dharma Shamsher basnet vs TS chettri : time to file written statement can be extended beyond 90 days for satisfactory and justifiable reasons

You may also like...