Today six law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2011 (1) SCC 176 : Pepsico india holdings pvt ltd vs food inspector : Mere presence of pesticide residue does not ipso facto render article of food adulterated ( food adulteration )[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in
Vinothpandian: 2011 (1) SCC 176 : Pepsico india holdings pvt ltd vs food inspector : Mere presence of pesticide residue does not ipso facto render article of food adulterated ( food adulteration )
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2011 (1) SCC 176 : Pepsico india holdings pvt ltd vs food inspector : Mere presence of pesticide residue does not ipso facto render article of food adulterated ( food adulteration )
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in choosing a man to whom she gets married
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 86 : Union bank of india vs Rajendra wadhwa & others : As per rule 8(2) of the security interest rules possession notice is to be published in leading newspapers not later than seven days from date of taking possession
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1557 : khumukcham nikita devi vs state of manipur : A victim can engage a lawyer of her choice to assist the prosecution with the permission of the court ( sec 301 CRPC 1973 )
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 100 : Assistant commissioner ( CT ) Anna salai 111 Assessment circle vs indian overseas bank ; financial institutions being secured creditors would have priority of charge over mortgaged property in regard to tax another dues ( sec 31 – B SARFASI act )
[07/05, 16:13] Vinothpandian: 2014(2) DRTC 810 : Dena bank vs AAIFR & others : An interim order to stay section 13(4) SARFASI proceedings is only an aid or an arrangement which entitles parties to main proceedings to work out modalities till final adjudication , till measures themselves are set aside under sec 13(4) it cannot be said to be invalid or illegal
