Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: 5 Now I challenged both judgements delivered by madras HC before honble Supreme Court which is going to be heard by honble Bench of justice ABhay oka..

[11/08, 16:46] Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: 1 HON’BLE division bench of madras relied on Bombay Division Bench judgement in sampath Ganesh vs union of India and dismissed the petition of venkatasivakumar vs union of India challenging constitutional validity of reg 7A in WP 13229/20
[11/08, 16:46] Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: 2 Honble division bench of madras highcourt relied on WP 13229/20 again venkatasivakumar vs UOIand dismissed WP 16650/20 challenging constitutional validity of sec 204 of IBC and reg 23A of ibbi regulations
[11/08, 16:46] Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: 4 Honble Madras Highcourt in a review petition 35 /24 against WP16650/20 agreed with the petitioner Venkatasivakumar that the judgement rendered in WP 13229/20 is wrong as the learned ASG mislead them
I told Pratik Sarkar on different grounds
[11/08, 16:46] Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: 3 Honble division bench of Mumbai HC reying on madras HC judgement in venkatasivakumar dismissed reg challenging 204/ 23A of IBC by my friend Pratik Sarkar
[11/08, 16:46] Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: 5 Now I challenged both judgements delivered by madras HC before honble Supreme Court which is going to be heard by honble Bench of justice ABhay oka..