Vinothpandian: 1991 (4) SCC 279 : Nilofar insaf vs state of MP : A settled issue cannot be belatedly sought to be unsettled in a collateral attack on ground which does not go to the root of the matter
[10/18, 14:27] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 246 : Nakulan vs deputy gen manager canara bank : Borrower availing personal loan and gold loan , bank entitled to retain as security gold ornaments pledged till personal loan is cleared
[10/18, 14:27] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed ahmed vs karnataka bank ltd : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily.contain reasons
[10/18, 14:27] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 128 : state bank of india & others vs veetee fine foods ltd : Tribunal constituted under the RDDBFI act cannot have powers like constitutional courts
[10/18, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2019 (9) SCC 144 para 9 : shrirang yadavrao waghmare vs state of maharastra : ” There can be no manner of doubt that a judge must decide the case only on the basis of the facts on record and the law applicable to the case , if a judge decides a case for any extraneous reasons then he is not performing his duty in accordance with law ”
[10/18, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 195 : Assistant divisional engineer , highways department , tiruppattur : Held suit not maintainable against public authority without notice under section 80(1) of CPC 1908 or without court granting leave to dispense with statutory period of 60 days
[10/18, 14:28] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 120 : V Alagar vs Inspector general of registration : Held under tamil nadu registration rules rule 55 , Registering authority bound to consider objections raised on grounds specified in rule 55
