Vinothpandian: 1999 (1) SCC 271 : sabia khan vs state of UP : filing totally misconceived petition amounts to abuse of process of court and waste of courts time , such litigant is not required to be dealt with lightly

[8/2, 16:41] Vinothpandian: 1999 (1) SCC 271 : sabia khan vs state of UP : filing totally misconceived petition amounts to abuse of process of court and waste of courts time , such litigant is not required to be dealt with lightly
[8/2, 16:41] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) All India criminal LR SC 504 : Abdul ghafoor vs state of Bihar : In cases of conviction and imposition of sentence of imprisonment , the court must show far greater indulgence and flexibility in applying the law of limitation than in any other kind of case
[8/2, 16:41] Vinothpandian: 2007 NCJ 412 SC : Reliance salt ltd vs cosmos enterprises : when a contract of bank guarantee is sought to be invoked , it was primarily for the bank to plead a case of fraud and not for a promisor to set up a case of breach of contract
[8/2, 16:41] Vinothpandian: 2015 (4) SCC 164 ; Union of india vs SN maity : In matters pertaining to departmental proceedings , merely because words ” until further orders ” are used would not confer allowance on employer to act with caprice
[8/2, 16:41] Vinothpandian: 2011 (13) SCC 296 : suba singh vs davinder kaur : An action for civil damages is not prosecution and a decree of damages is not a punishment
[8/2, 16:41] Vinothpandian: 2013 (3) CCC 602 : Mohd Ahmed vs Harish kumar agarwal : An amendment of plaint should not be refused on technical grounds , an amendment which specially serves to cause of justice and avoidance of multiplicity of litigation should be allowed ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 2207 : Kasimuddin Ahammad and others vs Rajjak Ali and another : The magistrate has the power to direct for further investigation only after filing of the police report in terms of section 173 ( 6) CRPC
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) crimes 255 : mahesh kumar vs state of bihar : In a recovery of ganja case , court would not be authorised to detain the accused beyond sixty days
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 475 ; Dr Bibhas debnath vs state of west bengal : pleadings in a proceedings under sec 125 CRPC are like pleadings in a civil case and pleadings could be amended in appropriate circumstances
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) SCC 537 : state of UP vs sanjay kumar : life imprisonment cannot be equivalent to imprisonment for 14 years or 20 years , rather it always meant as the whole natural life
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) crimes 309 : Shahejadkhan mahebubkhan pathan vs state of gujarat : Where a substantial term of imprisonment is inflicted , an excessive fine should not be imposed except in exceptional cases
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : civil appeal no 6026-6028 of 2021 dated 28- 09- 2021 Malook singh and others vs state of punjab : services rendered by adhoc employees prior to their regularisation cannot be counted for purpose of seniority
[8/3, 11:05] Vinothpandian: 2008 (2) SCC 660 : state of punjab vs jalour singh : lok Adalats should resist their temptation to play the part of judges and constantly strive to function as concillators

You may also like...