Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 176 : state of kerala vs Maxon john : when a person is produced from police custody with bodily injury , court has to presume that the person was subjected to torture

[4/10, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 176 : state of kerala vs Maxon john : when a person is produced from police custody with bodily injury , court has to presume that the person was subjected to torture
[4/10, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2000(1) RCR ( criminal ) 690 : state vs Ravi @ munna : In a criminal trial accused not represented by any counsel , appointment of counsel at state expense is not an idle formality , it is a right enshrined under art 21 of constitution of india
[4/10, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 1693 : Alex kuruvilla vs oriental bank of commerce : SARFASI act being a special act and a code in itself to protect secured assets of bank , such assets has to be sold by modes provided under the security interest ( enforcement ) rules rule 8 and 9 , Rule 8 (8) permits sale by private treaty only with condition that private sale terms have to be by a written treaty and not an oral one
[4/10, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 257 : Kailash chandra sharma vs ICICI bank ltd and others : Notice under section 13 (2) of the SARFASI act to be issued by secured creditor need to be valid and effective in law , if such a notice is issued by a counsel representing bank / secured creditor / authorised officer under section 13 (2) on instruction founded on a conscious decision approving such a step , same cannot be repudiated to be in contravention of letter and spirit of provisions of acts and rules
[4/10, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 179 : saraswat co- operative bank ltd vs state of maharastra : Bank sought possession of secured assets , collector did not take action merely on ground of pendency of suit , collector bound to follow principles of law , cannot enter upon an adjudication of merits of claim of bank , exercise of powers by collector under sec 14 of SARFASI act explained