Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) SCC 257 : Ramnaresh vs state of chattisgarh : Merely because a crime is heinous per se may not be a sufficient reason for imposition of death penalty without reference to other factors and attended circumstances

[10/16, 17:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cri ) 626 : Dhurga vaishnavi shivamoorthi vs murthy : conduct of accused subsequent to release on bail and supervening circumstances alone relevant for cancellation of bail ( sec 439 (2) CRPC 1973 )
[10/16, 17:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) CTC 442 : Nissan motors corporate office vs S giri prasad : summoning of an accused in a criminal case a serious matter , summoning order must reflect about application of mind to facts of case and law applicable thereto , when magistrate did not record basis of taking cognizance and simply ordered to issue summons to accused , complaint held liable to be quashed
[10/16, 17:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 413 : omega enterprises Andheri mumbai vs ministry of civil aviation : Held scope of judicial interference in commercial contracts under art 226 is very limited
[10/18, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) SCC 257 : Ramnaresh vs state of chattisgarh : Merely because a crime is heinous per se may not be a sufficient reason for imposition of death penalty without reference to other factors and attended circumstances
[10/18, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2014 (3) SCC 1 : shatrughan chauhan vs union of india : Execution of death sentence must be in consonance with constitutional mandate and not in violation of constitutional principles
[10/18, 09:42] Vinothpandian: 2010 (1) SCC 775 : Dilip premnarayan tiwari vs state of maharastra : In a death sentence matter it is not only nature of crime but background of criminal , his psychology , his social conditions and mindset for committing offence is relevant