Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 594 : deepak apparels pvt ltd vs city union bank ltd : finding recorded by high court on special facts and circumstances of case cannot be a binding precedent

[8/8, 17:11] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 594 : deepak apparels pvt ltd vs city union bank ltd : finding recorded by high court on special facts and circumstances of case cannot be a binding precedent
[8/8, 17:11] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 532 : bhopal thapa vs bina boro : Existence of fraudulent act can override bar imposed under sec 34 of the SARFASI.act as well as under sec 18 of the RDDBFI.act 1993 , disputed facts on fraud cannot be decided by debts recovery tribunal
[8/8, 17:11] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 686 : celestine vs Ebisal : Exemplified pleadings are required whenever fraud is pleaded in a plaint ( order 6 rule 4 CPC 1908 )
[8/8, 17:11] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) CTC 264 : lancor holdings ltd vs prem kumar menon : court cannot repair award and cannot supplement relief awarded with its own relief ( sec 34 Arbitration and coincilation act 1996 )
[8/8, 17:11] Vinothpandian: 2013 (3) CPJ 294 : shriram transport finance co ltd vs jaspal singh , Ranjeet singh : In an hire purchase agreement , financier is real owner of vehicle and person who take loan retains vehicle only as bailee / trustee