Vinothpandian: 2016 (4) CTC 484 : K kandasamy vs mahalakshmi metal and scrap processing pvt ltd : necessary particulars about cheque to be stated for validating an issuance of notice under sec 138 NI act , prosecution.based on defective notice vitiated and

[11/21, 12:40] Vinothpandian: 2016 (4) CTC 484 : K kandasamy vs mahalakshmi metal and scrap processing pvt ltd : necessary particulars about cheque to be stated for validating an issuance of notice under sec 138 NI act , prosecution.based on defective notice vitiated and quashed
[11/21, 12:40] Vinothpandian: 1989 (1) SCC 405 : Kuldip kaur vs surinder singh : In a criminal proceedings after awarding sentence and compensation , default sentence is a mode of enforcing recovery of amount imposed by way of compensation
[11/21, 12:40] Vinothpandian: 2000(1) RCR ( criminal ) 690 : state vs Ravi @ munna : In a criminal trial accused not represented by any counsel , appointment of counsel at state expense is not an idle formality , it is a right enshrined under art 21 of constitution of india
[11/21, 12:40] Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 176 : state of kerala vs Maxon john : when a person is produced from police custody with bodily injury , court has to presume that the person was subjected to torture
[11/21, 12:40] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 836 : Hdfc bank ltd mumbai & others vs prestige educational trust : section 13 (4) of the SARFASI act not conferred any power on secured creditor to take possession of any assets other than secured assets , if attempted its ultravires to provisions of act
[11/21, 12:40] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) CTC 924 : varun pahwa vs Renu choudhary : power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technicalities ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )