Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) CCC 1 SC : madanuri sri Rama chandra murthy vs syed jalal : order 7 rule 11 CPC application can be decided at any stage of the suit on the basis of averments of the plaint only , power should be exercised in case of a suit manifestly vexatious and meritless in the sense of not disclosing any right to sue

[5/20, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) CCC 1 SC : madanuri sri Rama chandra murthy vs syed jalal : order 7 rule 11 CPC application can be decided at any stage of the suit on the basis of averments of the plaint only , power should be exercised in case of a suit manifestly vexatious and meritless in the sense of not disclosing any right to sue
[5/20, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 17 SC : Raghavendra swamy mutt vs uttaradi mutt : High courts power to pass ex parte order or interim order subject to postulates of section 100 of CPC 1908 , no ex parte or interim order can be passed without formulating substantial question of law ( section 100 CPC 1908 )
[5/20, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2014 (3) CCC 664 : Ajit singh vs vinod kumar and others : with regard to compulsory registration of a document , section.53 A of transfer of property act 1882 is for benefit of a transferee , if a document of type mentioned in section 53 A of transfer of property act is not registered , transferee will not be able to take benefit of said provision of section 53 A , however it does not mean that such document does not require to be compulsorily registered
[5/20, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 1 SC : Harshad govardhan sondagar vs IARC ltd : A lease of secured asset made by borrower after he receives notice under sec 13 (2) of SARFASI act from secured creditor intending to enforce that secured asset will not be valid lease
[5/20, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 335 SC : Ram kishun & others vs state of UP : In a recovery proceedings there must be application of mind by authority concerned while approving / accepting report of approved valuer and fixing reserve price , failure to do so would amount to material irregularity and ultimately vitiate subsequent proceedings
[5/20, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2014(2) DRTC 810 : Dena bank vs AAIFR & others : An interim order to stay section 13(4) SARFASI proceedings is only an aid or an arrangement which entitles parties to main proceedings to work out modalities till final adjudication , till measures themselves are set aside under sec 13(4) it cannot be said to be invalid or illegal