Why has MHC refused bail for Minister VSB? 1. It does not appear his medical condition could be taken care only if he is released on bail 2. He can directly or indirectly influence witnesses 3. Abscondence of his brother and co-accused Ashok Kumar 4. His past conduct 5. Attack on Income Tax officials during the raid #SenthilBalaji #ED

You may also like...

• 

  Considering the fact that litigants intending to pursue disputes pertaining to intellectual property are left remediless for a long time after the abolition of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, we grant a week’s time to the State Government to issue notification for the inauguration of the Intellectual Property Division,” the Court said. Advocate Fakkir Mohideen appeared for the Madras High Court Registrar General. State Government Pleader P Muthukumar appeared for the TN government. Acting Chief Justice T Raja and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said that the government has been sitting on the notification since October 2022, without any justification.

  February 18, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 18, 2023

• 

  [2/15, 19:16] sekarreporter1: Pachiappa college teachers case mhc judge mahadevan bench case not reached teachers adv ng r prasath seek time court adjourn the case on 23 rd case against SMS j order [2/15, 19:16] sekarreporter1:for teachers battle of advts appeared .

  February 15, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 15, 2023

• 

  W.P.(MD)No.16339 of 2021 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. When the matter came up for hearing on 28.11.2023, this Court passed the following order: “Heard Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Veerakathiravan, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents. Whether the Judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench in Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women (Autonomous), Teynampet, Chennai-600 018 Vs. State of Tamil Nadu. Represented by its Principal Secretary to the Government, Department of Higher Educational, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 and Others reported in 2023 (5) CTC 529, upholding the power of the State for seat-sharing to an extent of 50% through the merit list prepared by the competent authority, is not in line with the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation’s case and P.A.Inamdhar’s case and hence requires re-consideration?” 16. The Registry is directed to place this order before the Hon’ble Chief Justice in order to constitute a Full Bench to answer the questions that have been referred to in this order. 06.12.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order TSG N. ANAND VENKATESH,J. TSG W.P.(MD)Nos.16339 of 2021 06.12.2023 .

  December 8, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 8, 2023