![[8/3, 13:18] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1687007458752094208?t=HRl6_ZdKUHUI_pQWp7AqlQ&s=08 [8/3, 13:18] sekarreporter1: pachiappas college teachers case full order. This Court constitutes a two member Committee comprising of the Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Gokuldas (Retired), High Court of Madras MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. (Order of the court was made by R.Mahadevan, J.) At the outset, two issues arise https://sekarreporter.com/pachiappas-college-teachers-case-full-order-this-court-constitutes-a-two-member-committee-comprising-of-the-honble-mr-justice-b-gokuldas-retired-high-court-of-madras-mahadevan-j-and-moham/](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Therefore, we are not inclined to condone the delay of 1072 days in filing the appeals. 7. Thus, for the reasons stated above, these miscellaneous petitions fail and are accordingly, dismissed. Consequently, the tax case appeals are rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs. [R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 21.09.2023 Internet : Yes Neutral Citation: Yes / No gya To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, D Bench, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle IV(5) Chennai R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. gya M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2012 AND T.C.A.SR.Nos.32642 and 32644 of 2012 21.09.2023
- Previous story [10/17, 16:57] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1714241289120792864?t=S4SoFsaK6YsIHzO06rYyaA&s=08 [10/17, 16:57] sekarreporter1: [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Vijay narayan for admk [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Grajagopal for sasikala [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: [10/17, 16:30] sekarreporter1: Sasikala case Nov 2 adj [10/17, 16:31] sekarreporter1: 👍 [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: R.subramaniyan ,n.senthilkumar [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Vijay narayan for admk [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: Grajagopal for sasikala [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: [10/17, 16:30] sekarreporter1: Sasikala case Nov 2 adj [10/17, 16:31] sekarreporter1: 👍 [10/17, 16:47] sekarreporter1: R.subramaniyan ,n.senthilkumar
Recent Posts
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
- [03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cGUt8iBk5cQ?si=UCGS1VjofK0d0NCs[03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
- [03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cGUt8iBk5cQ?si=UCGS1VjofK0d0NCs[03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: 👍