Follow:
- Next story I find that the Gift Deed of the year 1987 is valid in law, wherein the place earmarked as a big park in the layout has been gifted to the Municipality and the 1st respondent Municipality in order to cater the needs of the general public has permitted the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board to do the needful and carrying their activities and hence, I find that the petitioners have not made prima facie case nor any balance of convenience in their endeavor. On the contrary, I find that there is prima facie case only in respect of the first respondent Municipality and hence, I am not inclined to grant any interim order. 10. Accordingly, this writ miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. 24.03.2023 ata RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J, ata Pre-delivery order made in W.M.P.No.7679 of 2023 in W.P.No.7565 of 2023 24.03.2023
- Previous story சென்னை கிழக்கு மாவட்ட வழக்கறிஞர் அணி சார்பில் **மாண்புமிகு தமிழக முதல்வர், கழக தலைவர் தளபதியின் 70 வது பிறந்தநாள் விழா**வின் தொடர் நிகழ்ச்சியாக **மாண்புமிகு இந்து சமய அறநிலையத்துறை மற்றும் சென்னை பெருநகர வளர்ச்சி குழுமம் அமைச்சர் அண்ணன் P.K.சேகர்பாபு**அவர்களின் ஏற்பாட்டில் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர், பாராளுமன்ற மேலவை உறுப்பினர் திருமிகு.பி.வில்சன் M.P.,
Recent Posts
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
More
Recent Posts
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.