[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC ( cri ) 181 : Abdul wahab k vs state of kerala : Public prosecutor under section 321 CRPC 1973 can withdraw from prosecution at any time before the judgement is pronounced , but he has to apply his / her own mind and consider the effect of withdrawal on the society in the event such permission is granted[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aman Lohia vs kiran Lohia transferred case ( civil ) no 25 of 2021 dated 17- 03- 2021 : family court required to follow procedure under CPC and provide parties with sufficient time and opportunity to present their claim in form of pleadings and evidence before determination of dispute[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aparna bhatt & others vs state of madhya pradesh criminal appeal no 329 of 2021 dated 18- 03- 2021 : bail conditions should not mandate require or permit contact between accused and victim , such conditions should seek to protect complainant from any further harassment by accused[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : chief information commissioner vs high court of gujarat civil appeal no 1966 – 1967 of 2020 dated 4- 03- 2020 : suo moto disclosure of information on important aspects of working of a public authority is an essential component of information regime[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : state bank of india vs Ajay kumar sood : SLP no 4038 of 2021 dated 12- 03- 2021 : court judgements should be in language which can be understood not only by lawyers but also to citizens who approached courts[07/03, 11:32] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)