Follow:
- Next story நீதிபதி சி.வி.கார்த்திகேயன் அனல் பறக்கும் அதிரடி உத்தரவு பைக் ரேஸ் case youtube தளத்தை மூடிவிட்டு பைக்கை எரித்து விடும்படி கருத்து
- Previous story Murasoli trust case sc order
Recent Posts
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam’s view on “adjournments” and “speedy disposal of trial”:
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
More
Recent Posts
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam’s view on “adjournments” and “speedy disposal of trial”:
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b