Follow:
- Next story OPS Appeal not listed today So Sr Adv P H Arvind Pandian mentioned in MHC RMDJ MSQJ bench Appeal will be taken on Wednesday – November 15 : Judges
- Previous story Family pension case. 22.In view of the same, I am inclined to quash the impugned order of the first respondent and thereafter, remand back the file of the petitioner to the respondents, directing them to give liberal interpretation to the mandates of G.O.Ms.No.350 Finance (Pension) Department dated 28.11.2011 and sanction family pension to the petitioner in terms of the above discussion within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 23.Accordingly, the Writ Petition stand allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Mrn To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, CEO Office campus, Pudukottai – 622001. 2.The District Educational Officer (Secondary), CEO Office Campus, Pudukottai – 622001. L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Mrn W.P.(MD)No.21964 of 2023 02.11.2023
Recent Posts
- Judge sathiskumar / order./In the result, the order passed by the first respondent in refusal checkslip in RFL/Rasipuram/104/2024 dated 05.04.2024 is set aside and the first respondent is directed to receive and register the sale deed dated 05.04.2024 within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
More
Recent Posts
- Judge sathiskumar / order./In the result, the order passed by the first respondent in refusal checkslip in RFL/Rasipuram/104/2024 dated 05.04.2024 is set aside and the first respondent is directed to receive and register the sale deed dated 05.04.2024 within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்