Follow:
- Next story [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726956515750519164?t=VqgJBzyjGJLSkUcTl3pWXg&s=08 [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: in behalf of ugc asg ARL Sundaresan arguments# It was stated by the Madras University in the last hearing that they had not received grants from UGC. UGC had filed an affidavit setting out the details of grants released by UGC to Madras University on a regular basis. The Honble Chief Justice observed that from institutions of this level there should not be such statements. It was further argued that the nomination of UGC member in the search panel for VC was mandatory and MU and Govt of TN were bound by it. Chief bench At the end at the request of Learned AG case was adjourned
- Previous story Justice Kaul told the Attorney General, “You see what will happen at some stage is that we can’t let Judges, whom we think should not work in ‘A’ Court continue to work. Which will mean, again something which is not very pleasant, I will not like to say, and you understand the consequence. If it is driven to that, that is what will happen. It will embarrass those judges if we do that. I won’t like to do that because they have to go and work in some other Court. You understand the step which is in contemplation or which will happen. Please don’t let that happen. It will dilute the authority of those Judges, to work wherever they go, were we to take such a step”.
Recent Posts
- முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!
- The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.
- [29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
More
Recent Posts
- முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் #செந்தில்பாலாஜியின் ஜாமீன் மனுவை #மே 6ம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்தது #உச்சநீதிமன்றம்!
- The Madras High Court Advocates Association would like to point out that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, a Statutory Body under the Advocates Act, 1961, issues Vehicles Stickers to enrolled advocates after verification of their RC Books & Enrolment Certificates, with the Vehicle Registration Number and Hologram. This is meant for seamless entry and parking on Court campuses and not to seek immunity from traffic rules. A clear distinction needs to be made between the issue of such authorised stickers by a statutory body and advocate stickers sold on pavements which even non-advocates may end up misusing.
- [29/04, 11:38] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || கொடநாடு வழக்கு ஒத்திவைப்பு
- [29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt CJ’s Bench agrees to hear tomorrow a plea by a doctor, employed in Australia, for conduct of special polling in Coimbatore parliamentary constituency for the voters whose names were found to be missing from the electoral list @THChennai BG[29/04, 11:35] sekarreporter1: .
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial