11/9, 12:38] Vinothpandian: 2012(1) CTC 561 : nicholos Piramal India Pvt Ltd vs The inspector general of registration : indian stamp act 1899 section 47-A : held registering authority cannot demand stamp duty more than guide line value of property

[11/9, 12:38] Vinothpandian: 2012(1) CTC 561 : nicholos Piramal India Pvt Ltd vs The inspector general of registration : indian stamp act 1899 section 47-A : held registering authority cannot demand stamp duty more than guide line value of property
[11/9, 12:38] Vinothpandian: 2014(5) CTC 199 : Kuppuraj k vs M Rajasulochana : Hindu marriage act 1955 sec 13(1)(1-a) : mere apprehensions in mind of appellant that it would be harmful and injurious to live with his wife cannot be ground for divorce
[11/9, 12:38] Vinothpandian: AIR 2010 SC 3796 : Bhanumati vs state of UP : The judge cannot act like a phonographic recorder but he must act as an interpreter of the social context articultated in the legal text
[11/9, 12:38] Vinothpandian: AIR 1997 ori 1 : Nityananda behara vs state of Orissa : A lawyer appointed as notary does not hold any office of profit under the state government and is eligible for appointment as the president of the district forum