15:39] Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 176 : state of kerala vs Maxon john : when a person is produced from police custody with bodily injury , court has to presume that the person was subjected to torture[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CPR 151 : Dr srikar reddy & others vs srishti

[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 176 : state of kerala vs Maxon john : when a person is produced from police custody with bodily injury , court has to presume that the person was subjected to torture
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CPR 151 : Dr srikar reddy & others vs srishti associates : consumer forum has held that a medical practioner would be liable only when his conduct fell below that of standards of a reasonably competent practioner in his field
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) CCC 329 : santhakumari vs Raghavan unni : under order x111 CPC court has ample power to weed out inadmissible document or a document which is not a valid document at all in eye of law
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) crimes 80 : mangat Ram vs state of Haryana : failure of a married person to take his wife along with him to the place where he is working or posted would not amount to cruelty .
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2018 (6) CTC 510 : puruvankara projects ltd rep by its CEO vs Ranjani venkatraman ganesh ; Re appreciation of evidence like court of appeals not permissible under section 34 of the arbitration and coincilation.act
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2019 (8) SCC 27 : vishnu kumar tiwari vs state of uttar pradesh , through home secretary : If protest petition fulfills requirements of complaint , magistrate may treat it as complaint under sec 200 CRPC read with sec 202 CRPC
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) CCC 391 : shri shiva kumar pradhan vs smt meena Rawat : Provisions of section 127 CRPC are always subject to provisions of section 125 CRPC and if a person ceases to be entitled to receive maintainance under section 125 CRPC he cannot seek an order of enhancement under sec 127 CRPC 1973
[12/02, 15:39] Vinothpandian: 2014 (16) SCC 1 : Pooja Ravinder devidasani vs state of maharastra : To attract a case under sec 141 of the NI act a specific role must have been played by a director of the company for fastening vicarious liability