Follow:
- Next story Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) CTC 285 ( DB ) : lakshmanan p vs kamalasaraswathi : order47 rule 1 CPC 1908 : Any opinions / expressions at time of hearing , unless made part of final order held cannot be raised as grounds of review[24/02, 11:38] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) CTC 772 SC : Avishek goenka vs union of india : held enforcement of law if causes inconvenience cannot be a ground for rendering provision of statute book as unenforceable
- Previous story [23/02, 21:46] sekarreporter1: All govt authorities have to file cases only through efiling[23/02, 21:46] sekarreporter1: From1.3.2024[23/02, 21:46] sekarreporter1: R.O.C. No.12778A/2024/Comp.3
Recent Posts
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
More
Recent Posts
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan