[25/04, 22:38] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Radhika Sri Hari andanother v. Commissioner of Police reported in 2014 (2) CTC 695, the Hon’ble Madras High Court held that:-

When police protection is sought for the implementation of a civil court order it should be given
readily. Police should not insist on a specific court direction to give police protection.

Article by E.Duraivaiyapuri, Advocate,
YMCA Building,
Chennai – 1.
[26/04, 07:29] sekarreporter1: 👍

[25/04, 22:38] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Radhika Sri Hari and
another v. Commissioner of Police reported in 2014 (2) CTC 695, the Hon’ble Madras High Court held that:-

When police protection is sought for the implementation of a civil court order it should be given
readily. Police should not insist on a specific court direction to give police protection.

Article by E.Duraivaiyapuri, Advocate,
YMCA Building,
Chennai – 1.
[26/04, 07:29] sekarreporter1: 👍

You may also like...