[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 308 of 2022 dated 25-02-2022 Saudan singh vs state of Uttar pradesh : Denying bail to person for fault of counsel who does not argue amounts to parity of justice[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: criminal appeal no 540 of 2022 dated 1-04-2022 Brijesh kumar@ Ramu vs state of Uttar pradesh : In a bail application before the high court , approach of high court in rejecting bail application with simple sentence cannot be appreciated[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 463 of 2022 dated 22-03-2022 vijay kumar ghai vs state of west Bengal: breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) CTC 446 : M / S Alagu pharmacy & others vs N magudeswari : compromise with regard to eviction proceedings recorded in police station not acceptable , a tenant can be evicted only when the grounds of eviction in terms of the concerned contract is made out
[26/03, 11:36]
[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 308 of 2022 dated 25-02-2022 Saudan singh vs state of Uttar pradesh : Denying bail to person for fault of counsel who does not argue amounts to parity of justice
[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: criminal appeal no 540 of 2022 dated 1-04-2022 Brijesh kumar@ Ramu vs state of Uttar pradesh : In a bail application before the high court , approach of high court in rejecting bail application with simple sentence cannot be appreciated
[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 463 of 2022 dated 22-03-2022 vijay kumar ghai vs state of west Bengal: breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating
[26/03, 11:36] Vinothpandian: 2018 (5) CTC 446 : M / S Alagu pharmacy & others vs N magudeswari : compromise with regard to eviction proceedings recorded in police station not acceptable , a tenant can be evicted only when the grounds of eviction in terms of the concerned contract is made out
