[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2020(1) CTC 799 : latha Ilangovan vs usha Rajaram : art 227 constitution of india : held recording reasons for granting ex parte interim order mandatory and not mere formailty ,failure to give such reasons amounts to denial of justice[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2020(1) CTC 515 : evidence act 1872 sec 45 : court can accept or reject expert opinion ,while rejecting opinion of expert ,especially one who deposed in court ,court must give cogent and convincing reason for such rejection[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2007(11) SCC 297 ; madhumilan syntex ltd vs union of india : income tax / failure to pay tax deducted at source ,levy of penalty for non – payment of tax does not affect power to prosecute accused persons[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2013(1) crimes 208 : lokesh kirankumar shah vs shraddha lokesh shah : once legal provision has been interpreted by supreme court of india after considering all aspects of matter such interpretation made by supreme court would be binding on all courts within the territory of india[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 289 : sundaram.BNP paribas home finance ltd malappuram vs nisha : Recovery proceedings initiated under SARFASI.act , only prayer in writ court that petitioner may be permitted to clear outstanding amount due to bank in easy instalments , writ.court exercised its discretion in granting ten instalments to pay entire outstanding amount along with interest accrued , interest of bank protected
[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2020(1) CTC 799 : latha Ilangovan vs usha Rajaram : art 227 constitution of india : held recording reasons for granting ex parte interim order mandatory and not mere formailty ,failure to give such reasons amounts to denial of justice
[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2020(1) CTC 515 : evidence act 1872 sec 45 : court can accept or reject expert opinion ,while rejecting opinion of expert ,especially one who deposed in court ,court must give cogent and convincing reason for such rejection
[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2007(11) SCC 297 ; madhumilan syntex ltd vs union of india : income tax / failure to pay tax deducted at source ,levy of penalty for non – payment of tax does not affect power to prosecute accused persons
[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2013(1) crimes 208 : lokesh kirankumar shah vs shraddha lokesh shah : once legal provision has been interpreted by supreme court of india after considering all aspects of matter such interpretation made by supreme court would be binding on all courts within the territory of india
[26/09, 12:10] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 289 : sundaram.BNP paribas home finance ltd malappuram vs nisha : Recovery proceedings initiated under SARFASI.act , only prayer in writ court that petitioner may be permitted to clear outstanding amount due to bank in easy instalments , writ.court exercised its discretion in granting ten instalments to pay entire outstanding amount along with interest accrued , interest of bank protected
