27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2019(5) CTC 522 : M Antonysamy vs S Mumtaj : legal services authorities act 1987 sec 21 : Held lok Adalat award obtained by fraud and collusion ,fraud vitiates all solemn acts ,award obtained by playing fraud is nullity and non – est in eyes of law ,award set aside by exercising power under article 227 of constitution[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2013
[27/02, 10:26]
27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2019(5) CTC 522 : M Antonysamy vs S Mumtaj : legal services authorities act 1987 sec 21 : Held lok Adalat award obtained by fraud and collusion ,fraud vitiates all solemn acts ,award obtained by playing fraud is nullity and non – est in eyes of law ,award set aside by exercising power under article 227 of constitution
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2013
: 2019(5) CTC 522 : M Antonysamy vs S Mumtaj : legal services authorities act 1987 sec 21 : Held lok Adalat award obtained by fraud and collusion ,fraud vitiates all solemn acts ,award obtained by playing fraud is nullity and non – est in eyes of law ,award set aside by exercising power under article 227 of constitution
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2013(1) CTC 241 : A Nagarajan vs secretary to government housing and urban development department : writ petition filed challenging land acquisition proceedings is maintainable even after passing of award ,law laid down by supreme court in Patasi Devi vs state of Haryana 2012(9) SCC applied and followed
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2013(2) CTC 864 : Ramamoorthy vs MSR Sivakumar : objection to admissibilty of a document can be raised at any stage ,fact that document was admitted in evidence ,held would not bar right of party to challenge admissibilty of document at later stage
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: AIR 2007 Raj 117 : Suresh Kumar vs virendra kumar : mere filing of appeal does not make the decree unexecutable
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2017(1) CTC 729 (DB) : Jaffar sait vs union of india : service law : discretion conferred to disciplinary authority to place officer under suspension till termination of criminal proceedings should be exercised objectively ,protracted suspension without any valid reason is bad in law
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: AIR 2017 SC 4836 : om prakash vs reliance general insurance : policy condition does not bar settlement of genuine claims particularly when the delay in intimation or submission of documents is due to unavoidable circumstances
[27/02, 10:26] Vinothpandian: 2015(2) CTC 681 : Natrajan N vs executive officer ,chitlapakkam town panchayat : CPC 1908 sec 151 : civil court has got power to issue directions to party or to witness to forward complaint to police in case of any criminal offence like forgery being involved
