4 law tips mhc adv Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) MWN ( cri ) 504 : satpal singh vs state of punjab : satisfaction of court for granting protection under section 438 CRPC 1973 different from one under section 439 CRPC 1973

[1/3, 14:01] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) MWN ( cri ) 504 : satpal singh vs state of punjab : satisfaction of court for granting protection under section 438 CRPC 1973 different from one under section 439 CRPC 1973
[1/3, 14:01] Vinothpandian: 2015 (4) SCC 164 ; Union of india vs SN maity : In matters pertaining to departmental proceedings , merely because words ” until further orders ” are used would not confer allowance on employer to act with caprice
[1/3, 14:01] Vinothpandian: 2011 (8) SCC 679 : Bakshi dev Raj & another vs sudhir kumar : With regard to seeking instructions by counsels from parties , it is always desirable to get instructions in writing ( order 3 rule 1 CPC 1908 )
[1/3, 14:01] Vinothpandian: 2011 (3) SCC 545 : Parimal vs veena @ bharti : Held substituted service is meant to be resorted to serve notice at address known to parties where party had been residing last ( order 5 rule 20 CPC 1908 )