[6/20, 10:55] sekarreporter1: செந்தில் பாலாஜி கஸ்டடி no need என்று அமலாக்கத்துறை [6/20, 11:06] sekarreporter1: We have informed the court that we could not have custody due to his medical condition We have informed the court that we could not have custody due to his medical condition

You may also like...

• 

  With the attaining of finality on the aforesaid position of law, there is no doubt that the retrospective cancellation with effect from 01.04.2010 cannot be countenanced. Applying the ratio of the above judgment to the sequence of dates in this case, the appropriate date of cancellation would be 01.04.2017 onwards i.e. AY 2017-18 onwards. The impugned order is quashed to this extent and this writ petition stands disposed in terms of the above order. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.          18.11.2022 Index : Yes Speaking Order vs To The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – 2, Chennai – 600 034. Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. vs W.P.No.7116 of 2020 and WMP.Nos.8481 & 8483 of 2020 18.11.2022

  January 20, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 20, 2023

• 

  Discharge of accused – Husband accused in dowry and cruelty case – Wife of accused got acquittal on same offence – Husband entitled for discharge.

  September 13, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 13, 2020

• 

  Justice T Raja and Justice B Pugalendhi directed the police officials to produce the petitioner’s father before the court on January 9 failing which the Ramanathapuram superintendent of police should appear before the court to explain about the status of the case.

  January 9, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 9, 2020