You may also like...
-
![[2/7, 13:07] Sekarreporter: SC to hear pleas against protest at Shaheen Bagh on Monday: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-to-hear-pleas-against-protest-at-shaheen-bagh-on-monday/article30759512.ece [2/7, 13:07] Sekarreporter: The two-member Bench said it did not want to “influence” the Delhi Assembly elections by hearing the matter on Friday, a day ahead of the voting. The Supreme Court on Friday deferred hearing a plea to direct the Delhi Police to stop the Shaheen Bagh protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens and clear the “roadblock” till the Delhi elections are over. A Bench led by Justice S.K. Kaul indicated the court would not be party to any sort of pre-election narrative to garner votes a day before the polls on February 8.](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[2/7, 13:07] Sekarreporter: SC to hear pleas against protest at Shaheen Bagh on Monday: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-to-hear-pleas-against-protest-at-shaheen-bagh-on-monday/article30759512.ece [2/7, 13:07] Sekarreporter: The two-member Bench said it did not want to “influence” the Delhi Assembly elections by hearing the matter on Friday, a day ahead of the voting. The Supreme Court on Friday deferred hearing a plea to direct the Delhi Police to stop the Shaheen Bagh protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens and clear the “roadblock” till the Delhi elections are over. A Bench led by Justice S.K. Kaul indicated the court would not be party to any sort of pre-election narrative to garner votes a day before the polls on February 8.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 7, 2020
-
[19/03, 11:56] Vinothpandian: 2019(2) CWC 353 : Hitachi power europe Gmbh project office chennai vs central board of indirect taxes and customs : Taxability of services rendered ,notice demanding deposit of service tax ,resulting in issuance of show cause notice ,show cause notice issued without holding pre consulting hearing ,full opportunity to be given to supplier before issuing show cause notice if needed ,writ petition allowed[19/03, 11:56] Vinothpandian: 2019(1) CWC 802 : Aruchamy S vs principal secretary to govt : Request for revocation of suspension rejected citing, pendency of criminal case ,suspension for indefinite period neither in interest of indivdual nor in interest of public administration ,reinstatement directed pending finalization of criminal trial , writ petition allowed[19/03, 11:56] Vinothpandian: 2019(2) SCC ( crl ) 20 : state of madhya pradesh vs vikram das : power under article 142 cannot be invoked to impose sentence less than minimum sentence[19/03, 11:56] Vinothpandian: 2019(2) CTC 463 : Purushothaman A vs pondicherry industrial promotion development and investment corporation : Held grant of loan based on contract/ agreement between borrower and financial corporation ,court in exercise of article 226 of constitution cannot re – schedule loan and cannot re write terms of contract and issue positive direction for re – scheduling loan[19/03, 11:56] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) MWN ( cr ) DCC 127 : murugan KS vs M vadivel : sec 45 evidence act and sec 138 NI act : petition to call for sample signature from bank and to send cheque along with sample signature for expert opinion , petition dismissed and challenged now , signature in cheque not questioned in reply notice nor such a stand taken during pendency of complaint for 3 years ,petition held filed with a view to drag proceedings as rightly held by trial court , no illegality in impugned order passed by trial court , petition dismissed[19/03, 11:56] Vinothpandian: 2019(3) CTC 391 : state rep by inspector of police vs VP pandi : evidence act 1872 sec 56 & 57 : facts indisputably widely known to public can be taken judicial notice of by court
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 19, 2024
-