Follow:
- Next story நீதிபதிகள் சுரேஷ்குமார் மற்றும் குமரேஷ் பாபு bench அதிரடி உத்தரவு
- Previous story Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed with the costs of Rs.25,000/. The petitioner is directed to pay the costs to the The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Thiruvaleeswarar Temple, Padi, Chennai – 600 050 on or before 27.08.2023 and produce the receipt on 28.08.2023. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Post the matter under the caption, “For Reporting Compliance” on 28.08.2023. 16.08.2023 skr Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No To 1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Commissioner Land and Administration Office, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Nungumbakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam, Chennai – 600 040. The Special Tahsildar, (Assignment), Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, Chennai – 600 050. 7.The Village Administrative Officer, No. 10, Padi, Ambattur Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 8.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Thiruvaleeswarar Temple, Padi, Chennai – 600 050. 9.The Hereditary Trustee Arulmigu Thiruvaleeswarar Temple, Padi, Chennai – 600 050. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. skr W.P.No.24084 of 2023 16.08.2023
Recent Posts
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
- E Pass/ ooty/ kodaikanal/ order/W. P.No.15120 of 2019andW.M.P.Nos.15112 of 2019, 31696 of 2023 & 8422 of 2024N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.ANDD. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.W.P.No.15120 of 2019:Issue relating to Carrying CapacityThis matter relates to fixation of carrying capacity in respect of theNilgiris District and Dindigul District.
More
Recent Posts
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
- Excellant sir# W.P.Nos.17380 of 2017; 31345 of 2014 and W.P.(MD) No.24243 of 2017THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, the Founding Father of our Constitution,said “For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battlefor freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality”.
- E Pass/ ooty/ kodaikanal/ order/W. P.No.15120 of 2019andW.M.P.Nos.15112 of 2019, 31696 of 2023 & 8422 of 2024N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.ANDD. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.W.P.No.15120 of 2019:Issue relating to Carrying CapacityThis matter relates to fixation of carrying capacity in respect of theNilgiris District and Dindigul District.