You may also like...
-
Justice P N Prakash and Justice B Pugalendhi said that since the family members of the victims would be under great stress, the JM may go to Sathankulam for recording their statements. The JM should visit the house of the victim to conduct inquest as the women folk would be in mourning. REMOVE ADSThe JM should visit the police station, sub-jail and collect necessary documents such as medical records for better appreciation of the facts. Photographs and CCTV footage can also be collected wherever necessary. The judges observed that they were not interfering in the manner in which the inquest is conducted and directed adequate facilities and protection be ensured for the JM.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 27, 2020
-
W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 16.07.2021 made in W.P. No. 13796 of 2021 by NKKJ and RPAJ] Prayer : This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order passed by the First Respondent in DCC No. 126 of 2019 dated 27.03.2021 in
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 7, 2021
-
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Battu Devanand landmark judgement. Nithya a widow lady, approached the Hon’ble Madurai High Court to get an appointment on compassionate ground with her proper qualification and also to get death benefit of the husband/family benefit fund but the Tamil Nadu Government did not bother about it since 2017. Hon’ble judge took this as a Suo Moto and impleaded the Tamil Nadu chief secretary and ordered to provide job on compassionate ground with 6 weeks from today. 2nd direction given to settle all the family fund, provident fund, and so on. Hon’ble judge also directed to constitute a committee to fix time and frame rules to give a job to her and the chief secretary should report within 2 months and entire report should be submitted within 3 months.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 19, 2023