![[8/3, 12:16] sekarreporter1: The two daughters “Mahi” and “Priyanka” wanted to visit their father’s place of work. To fulfil the wishes of his daughters, he took them to his place of work, the Supreme Court. The two daughters visited their father’s workplace and were overwhelmed with joy. Their happiness was boundless. The father is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Hon’ble D. Y. Chandrachud. The mother is Mrs. Kalpana Chandrachud, and the two daughters are sitting in wheelchairs. Mahi and Priyanka are both differently abled. Can’t move about without a wheelchair. Besides, both are the adopted daughters of the Chandrachud couple. The picture was taken in the Supreme Court complex. *”GREATNESS LIES IN PRACTICE NOT IN THEORY”* [8/3, 12:16] sekarreporter1: Respected Sir, It’s very nice of you that you are the father of two adopted, differently abled, daughters and May the Almighty provide you the support to bring up Mahi and Priyanka to a higher level. Hats of to you Sir. V Ramesh, Advocate [8/3, 12:16] sekarreporter1: 🌹🌹🌹](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story சீனப் பொருட்களை புறக்கணிப்போம், துாக்கியெறிவோம்! o ஆர்ஆர். கோபால்ஜி வெளியீட்டாளர் தினமலர்
- Previous story The Supreme Court has given a split verdict on the issue whether a Family Court has the jurisdiction to entertain a petition for maintenance under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. Justice R. Banumathi opined that the Family Court has no jurisdiction, while Justice Indira Banerjee expressed a view that it has. Therefore, a larger bench will be constituted to decide the issue.
Recent Posts
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
- [03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cGUt8iBk5cQ?si=UCGS1VjofK0d0NCs[03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
- [03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cGUt8iBk5cQ?si=UCGS1VjofK0d0NCs[03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: 👍