Today CPC advt Suriyanarayanan by Sekar Reporter · December 25, 2019 ORDER I RULE 9 – 2009(7) SCJ 124 MALAY KUMAR GANGULY VS. DR. SUKUMAR MUKHERJEE AND OTHERS Proceedings initiated for medical negligence – withdrawal of cases against some of them not of much significance – negligence can be attributed when existing facilities not availed – medical negligence is not available for not rendering a facility which was not available – appeal cannot be dismissed for withdrawal against some of them after issuance of notice. ORDER VII RULE 11, ORDER XII RULE 6 – 2009(7) SCJ 299 NARINDER KUMAR MALIK VS. SURINDER KUMAR MALIK Suit for partition over a peace land allotted to partnership firm – application under Order VII Rule 11 dismissed – application for interim decree allowed granting preliminary decree for partition – appeal filed allowed with directions – amount directed to be deposited, not deposited in time – High Court concluded time was extendable – respondent did not honour his commitment – Appeals allowed. ORDER VII RULE 11 – 2009(7) SCJ 92 P.K. PALANISAMY VS. N. ARUMUGAM AND ANOTHER Suit for recovery of amounts filed with deficit court fees – court fee paid with delay – exparte decree passed for non-appearance of defendant – setting aside with delay allowed – application filed to reject the suit for filing the suit with deficit court fee – order extending time to deposit the deficit court fee not challenged – court fee is a matter between the state and the suitor – High Court erred in allowing revision. ORDER IX RULE 13 – 2009(7) SCJ 9 JOHN IMPEX PRIVATE LTD., ANOTHER VS. ATHUL KAPUR AND OTHERS Suit for eviction of tenant decreed exparte despite service of notice on defendant – no sufficient or cogent reason assigned for non appearance.
[4/25, 13:40] Sekarreporter1: [4/25, 13:39] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/04/25/watch-%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b3%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%9a%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%9e%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%a9%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%86%e0%ae%a9%e0%ae%a8/ [4/25, 13:39] Sekarreporter1: Watch “நீதிபதிகள் சிவஞானம் ஆனந்தி ஆகியோர் நாகர்கோவில் வக்கீல் சங்க உத்தரவிற்கு தடை” on YouTube [4/25, 13:44] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/04/25/watch-justice-c-saravanan-j-madras-high-court-order-service-tax-case-order-on-youtube/ [4/25, 15:13] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/t2I7ghEv0PA April 25, 2021 by Sekar Reporter · Published April 25, 2021
ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். Aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath August 18, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 18, 2022