You may also like...
-
Madras high court december 9th order
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 10, 2022
-
Justice S Vaidyanathan said. Expressing its disappointment, the court also directed the BCI to take action against the petitioner and conduct further proceedings pertaining to the misconduct. The court also ordered the High Court Registry to send a copy of this order to the MHAA, MBA and Women Lawyers’ Association to inform the members of the associations that they should not defend a dishonest tenant, “who happens to be a deceitful advocate, like the petitioner herein, who is not a gentleman, to safeguard the reputation of this profession”.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 13, 2021
-
On perusal of the impugned complaint, it seems that the criminal proceedings is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreck vengeance on the accused persons due to the private and personal grudge. Therefore, it meet the parameter laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court . Hence, continuing the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.8886 of 2008 on the file of the XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai is unfair and it is appropriate to quash the complaint against the petitioners and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the criminal proceeding against the petitioners in C.C.No.8886 of 2018 on the file of the XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai is quashed Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No 25.09.2023 mrp To The Metropolitan Magistrate, XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. V.SIVAGNANAM ,J. mrp Pre-delivery order made in Crl.O.P.No.292 of 2019 25.09.2023. For Petitioner … Mr. C. Munusamy for Mr.R.Arun Dattan For Respondent … Mr. M.Suresh Viswanath
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 28, 2023