You may also like...
-
Full order THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA O.S.A.No.105 of 2020- .As regards the legality of the interference of the Court to the Award of the Arbitrator is concerned, the Courts have got limited scope to interfere with the reasons and findings given by the Arbitrator on the basis of interpreting the terms of the contract. Even if an another view of interpretation or understanding of the terms of the contract is possible, those views cannot be allowed to substitute the reasoned understanding and construction given by the learned Arbitrator, so long as those views of the Arbitrator are reasonable and based on the materials placed before him. In view of these reasons, the Order of the learned single Judge which upheld the Award of the Arbitrator does not warrant any interference.] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 25, 2021
-
-
[8/4, 14:58] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1290580224069885952?s=08 [8/4, 14:58] Sekarreporter 1: [8/4, 14:56] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sureshkumarTOI/status/1290578907754684418?s=08 [8/4, 14:56] Sekarreporter 1: Justice N Anand Venkatesh of Madras HC adjourns to Aug 7 a case filed by former TN CM Jayalalithaa’s niece J Deepa against acquisition of Veda Nilayam. A similar case by nephew J Deepak had been referred to a Division Bench
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 4, 2020