Follow:
- Next story J.Ashok, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. Considering the importance of the prayer in this writ petition, we direct the respondents to file a detailed counter affidavit for passing further orders. List the writ petition after four weeks. [R.M.D.,J.] & [J.S.N.P.,J.] Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes bala 02.12.2022 R.MAHADEVAN ,J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J. bala W.P(MD)No.27463 of 2022 02.12.2022
- Previous story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.33186 of 2022 M.Venkatesan -Vs- 1.The District Registrar (Administration) Registration Department, No.63/40 Perumal Koil Street, Tindivanam Villupuram District 604 001. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government Pleader O R D E R It is made clear that, since many number of cases have come to the Court and it is almost become an everyday affair on the same issue despite these orders having been passed by this Court, the circular as indicated above shall be issued by the Inspector General of Registration immediately with a rider that, despite the circular being issued by the Inspector General of Registration if it is violated by any of the registering authority, that would be viewed seriously and in that case, action would be initiated against the said registering authority within the meaning of Section 68 of the Registration Act, 1908 and those registering authorities shall be held responsible for such dereliction. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Recent Posts
- 02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given that he was unfit for remand but it was suppressed and with fake medical certificate the NCB had remanded sathanantham.
- Temple order /THE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASADW.P.No.1680 of 2022A.Balaguru .. PetitionerVs.
- Chief justice and Baratha Chakravarthy order/ In view thereof, it is no longer possible for any State Government or Union of India to appoint anybody else, more specifically Deputy Labour Commissioner etc., as Presiding Officer of the Industrial Tribunal. Thus, it can be seen that virtually the impugned clauses in Section 7 or 7-A cannot be operated anymore. Thus, both the provisions that are challenged at present remain dead letters in the statute book, only to be repealed by an appropriate repeal act.
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
More
Recent Posts
- 02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:54] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1786054176918983158?t=Ddx5oTIw64NGjlJ1kp1BcQ&s=08[02/05, 20:55] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 20:19] Prabakaran Advt: In Jaffer Sadiq case co-accused A4 one Mr. Sadhanantham was in illegal custody for 9 days and medical certificate was given that he was unfit for remand but it was suppressed and with fake medical certificate the NCB had remanded sathanantham.
- Temple order /THE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASADW.P.No.1680 of 2022A.Balaguru .. PetitionerVs.
- Chief justice and Baratha Chakravarthy order/ In view thereof, it is no longer possible for any State Government or Union of India to appoint anybody else, more specifically Deputy Labour Commissioner etc., as Presiding Officer of the Industrial Tribunal. Thus, it can be seen that virtually the impugned clauses in Section 7 or 7-A cannot be operated anymore. Thus, both the provisions that are challenged at present remain dead letters in the statute book, only to be repealed by an appropriate repeal act.
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-