You may also like...
-
நீதிபதிகளின் கருணை உள்ளம் it is true that compassionate appointment cannot be demanded as a matter of right and it is for the person claiming such appointment to prove his/her eligibility and suitability for the post. At the same time, it cannot be lost sight of the fact in the present case that there was no reasoned order passed and the petitioner was kept in the dark as to the ground on which his request for compassionate appointment was rejected, as a result of which, the petitioner was not in a position to effectively put forth his defence, which is nothing, but violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, on this sole ground, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside, warranting interference by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned orders dated 12.04.2023 and 24.04.2023 are set aside. The matter is remitted back to the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner afresh and take a decision,with regard to the claim of the petitioner,within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner on production of necessary/relevant records to the petitioner. No costs. (S.V.N.J.) (K.R.S.J.) nv 12.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 28, 2023
-
[2/10, 20:34] Sekarreporter1: வீட்டுவசதி வாரியம் புதிய கட்டிடம் கட்ட டெண்டர் விட்டது இதை ரத்து செய்யக்கோரி திமுக தொழிற்சங்க சார்பாக பூச்சி முருகன் சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டில் வக்கீல் புகழ் காந்தி வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்தார் இந்த வழக்கு வரும் வெள்ளிக்கிழமை தலைமை நீதிபதி பெஞ்சில் விசாரணை வருகிறது [2/10, 20:34] Sekarreporter1: ..
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2021
-
Today in OBC reservation case Mr P. Wilson submitted that the Central government in its short counter affidavit at paragraph 11 has admitted the possibility of reservation in State surrendered seats for OBC. He submitted that the quota proposed by central government is as per Central Act and not as per TN Act and therefore the cap of 50% fixed is not acceptable. In so far as Saloni Kumar case is concerned the Supremecourt permitted writ petitioners to move High Coùrt even when it was brought to the notice of Hon’ble sc about pendency Of Saloni Kumari case before SC. This there is no legal bar for hearing of the case. He further submitted that issue in Saloni Kumar has become infructious as Saloni kumari which was filed in 2015 reservation was sought after Sc quashed in 2013 the 2010 NEET regulations which provided reservations. However in 2016, the Sc recalled the judgment and therefore from 2016 valid MCI regulations relating to Reservations have come in to force. Hence Saloni kumari case has in fact become a non issue. He also pointed out that when Central government gave EWS reservations in All India Quota , they never approached the SC . Therefore there cannot be one law for EWS and one law for OBC. The central government never approached sc when it decided to give reservation to OBC in central educational
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 22, 2020