You may also like...
-
However, it is the case of the petitioner that he has been regularly paying the maintenance, for which, he produced relevant documents, the same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the second respondent. In such circumstances, registering a case without conducting proper enquiry with regard to the payment of maintenance allowance is not correct and hence, the proceedings in STC.No.1393 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, is hereby quashed. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 06.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PJL To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN,J. PJL Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15704 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.6953 & 6954 of 2018 06.03.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 4, 2023
-
ஆன்லைன் வகுப்புகளுக்குத் தடையில்லை!- உயர்நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்பும் வழிகாட்டுதலும்..
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 10, 2020
-
Court says it won’t hesitate to quash it if there is evidence of foul-play The Madras High Court on Thursday warned the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (Tangedco) that it would not hesitate to quash a ₹1,330 crore worth tender notification issued by it on February 8 for supply of 20 lakh tonnes of imported steam coal of any origin if it finds evidence of any foul-play.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 12, 2021