You may also like...
-
The First Division Bench passed the interim order on a public interest litigation (PIL) argued by Senior Advocate Mr.T.Gowthaman appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, T. Santhosh, against the government officials’ decision to permit only 100 vehicles per day for the festival. The petitioner had contended that the function was an once in a year event having huge religious significance to the members of the Uppuli Naicker community. The devotees could not be expected to walk 20 km into the reserve forest and vehicles being parked in the main road will only create traffic congestion and chaos.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 29, 2024
-
The Trial Court dismissed this application and the said order was upheld by the High Court. The top court set aside the order of a trial court and high court which had refused to allow the plea of an owner for not proceeding on a suit filed by a caretaker seeking the he be not vacated from the premises
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 27, 2021
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM No.7429 of 2018and W.M.P.No.9225 of 2018 K.Kala … Petitioner. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Sreela For Mr.R.Diwakaran For R1 & R3 : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader For R2 & R5 : Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate For R4 : Dr.G.Babu For R6 : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate O R D E R
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 3, 2022