Follow:
- Next story [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1726956515750519164?t=VqgJBzyjGJLSkUcTl3pWXg&s=08 [11/21, 19:02] sekarreporter1: in behalf of ugc asg ARL Sundaresan arguments# It was stated by the Madras University in the last hearing that they had not received grants from UGC. UGC had filed an affidavit setting out the details of grants released by UGC to Madras University on a regular basis. The Honble Chief Justice observed that from institutions of this level there should not be such statements. It was further argued that the nomination of UGC member in the search panel for VC was mandatory and MU and Govt of TN were bound by it. Chief bench At the end at the request of Learned AG case was adjourned
- Previous story Justice Kaul told the Attorney General, “You see what will happen at some stage is that we can’t let Judges, whom we think should not work in ‘A’ Court continue to work. Which will mean, again something which is not very pleasant, I will not like to say, and you understand the consequence. If it is driven to that, that is what will happen. It will embarrass those judges if we do that. I won’t like to do that because they have to go and work in some other Court. You understand the step which is in contemplation or which will happen. Please don’t let that happen. It will dilute the authority of those Judges, to work wherever they go, were we to take such a step”.
Recent Posts
- [15/05, 21:44] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1790777729438056726?t=PuDAXXDYwMbrziHgEVGT-w&s=08[15/05, 21:44] sekarreporter1: சென்னை ஐகோர்ட் தலைமை நீதிபதி சஞ்சய கங்கா பூர்வாலாவுக்கு வருகிற 23ஆம் தேதி ஐகோர்ட்டில் வழியனுக்கு விழா நடக்கிறது
- Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: HONBLE JUSTICE SM SUBRAMANIAN.. MADRAS HC… directions to revenue authorities against false statements, fabricated documents to get legal heir or other certificates…. widely published in the media…Appeal to invoke perjury proceedings under sec 195(1)B R/w sec 340 of cr pc for the offences punishable under sec 191/193 of IPC by taking suo mottu cognizance by the Honble constitutional courtConsider the role of Advocates in such situations particularly the duty of a counsel to court vs to the client and it’s impact on the administration of justice[15/05, 20:12] sekarreporter1: 👍 super
- Seniority case order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
- Temple case order THE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASADW.P.No.16681 of 2022A.Radhakrishnan .. Petitioner
- Justices P.T. Asha and N. Senthilkumar granted the interim stay since a civil suit filed by Suddha Sanmarga Nilayam, claiming title over the property, was pending before a District Munsif court in Neyveli and the Virudhachalam Tahsildar too, was seized of a request to make changes in the revenue records.
More
Recent Posts
- [15/05, 21:44] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1790777729438056726?t=PuDAXXDYwMbrziHgEVGT-w&s=08[15/05, 21:44] sekarreporter1: சென்னை ஐகோர்ட் தலைமை நீதிபதி சஞ்சய கங்கா பூர்வாலாவுக்கு வருகிற 23ஆம் தேதி ஐகோர்ட்டில் வழியனுக்கு விழா நடக்கிறது
- Venkatasivakumar Mhc Adv: HONBLE JUSTICE SM SUBRAMANIAN.. MADRAS HC… directions to revenue authorities against false statements, fabricated documents to get legal heir or other certificates…. widely published in the media…Appeal to invoke perjury proceedings under sec 195(1)B R/w sec 340 of cr pc for the offences punishable under sec 191/193 of IPC by taking suo mottu cognizance by the Honble constitutional courtConsider the role of Advocates in such situations particularly the duty of a counsel to court vs to the client and it’s impact on the administration of justice[15/05, 20:12] sekarreporter1: 👍 super
- Seniority case order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
- Temple case order THE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASADW.P.No.16681 of 2022A.Radhakrishnan .. Petitioner
- Justices P.T. Asha and N. Senthilkumar granted the interim stay since a civil suit filed by Suddha Sanmarga Nilayam, claiming title over the property, was pending before a District Munsif court in Neyveli and the Virudhachalam Tahsildar too, was seized of a request to make changes in the revenue records.