Follow:
- Next story The Metropolitan Transport Corporation on Friday expressed its reservations over accepting a compensation of ₹11,055 a sq. ft., fixed by the Commissioner of Land Administration, for transferring the ownership of 0.57 acres of its land, situated adjacent to the Madras High Court campus, for the use of the court administration. When a related case was heard by a full Bench of Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice Subramonium Prasad, the counsel for the corporation, Rita Chandrasekaran, told the court that ₹11,055 a sq. ft. had been fixed as per the guideline value of the property and that it was too low an amount. She said that the government should come forward to pay the corporation at least ₹15,000 a sq. ft.
- Previous story [3/2, 07:10] Sekarreporter 1: சென்னையில் அமையுமா சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் கிளை?: https://m.dinamalar.com/detail.php?id=2492533&device=whatsapp (Sent via Dinamalar.com) [3/2, 07:10] Sekarreporter 1: Congrats Avu sir super story [3/2, 07:10] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁🍁
Recent Posts
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
More
Recent Posts
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan