You may also like...
-
In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed and the respondent Police is directed to proceed further with the investigation in accordance with law and complete the investigation and file a final report or a closure report, as the case may be, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneouspetition is closed.23.08.2023Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking Order nsaTo1.The Inspector of Police,R5, Virugambakkam Police Station, Chennai.2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai 600 104..N. ANAND VENKATESH, J. nsaCrl.O.P No.19136 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.12839 of 202323.08.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 12, 2024
-
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has ruled that under Rule 15 A of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, the Head of the Department has the authority to exercise suo motu power of review after an order is passed by a subordinate authority. After a larger Bench was constituted by the Chief Justice to resolve the issue following conflicting judgments by different Division Benches of the High Court, a Full Bench, comprising Justices S.S. Sundar, R. Subramanian and N. Sathish Kumar, answered the referred question in the affirmative.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2020
-