Follow:
- Next story today law tips 45] sekarreporter1: [03/05, 09:24] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: THE HON’BLE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT IN R.MALA CASE REPORTED IN 2007 (3) LW 68 HELD THAT: –
- Previous story [03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 4647 : Achpal @ Ramswaroop vs state of Rajasthan : With regard to extension of period for completing investigation , no court could either directly or indirectly extend such period , mere recording of submission of public prosecutor could not be taken to be an order granting extension[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 5128 : kamala vs MR mohan kumar : unlike matrimonial proceedings where strict proof of marriage is essential , in the proceedings under section 125 of CRPC , such strict standard of proof is not necessary as it is summary in nature meant to prevent vagrancy[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2005 (2) crimes 230 : Rajendra sail vs madhya pradesh high court bar association : Judgements of courts are public documents and can be commented upon , analyzed and criticized , but it has to be in dignified manner without attributing motives
Recent Posts
- роЪро┐ро▒рокрпНрокрпБ рокро│рпНро│ро┐роХро│ро┐ро▓рпН, роЖроЪро┐ро░ро┐ропро░рпН – рооро╛рогро╡ро░рпН ро╡ро┐роХро┐родро╛роЪрпНроЪро╛ро░родрпНродрпИ роиро┐ро░рпНрогропро┐родрпНродрпБ роХрпКро│рпНроХрпИ роорпБроЯро┐ро╡рпЖроЯрпБродрпНродрпБ, рооро╛рогро╡ро░рпНроХро│рпИ роХро╡ройро┐роХрпНроХ рокрпЛродрпБрооро╛рой роЖроЪро┐ро░ро┐ропро░рпНроХро│рпИ роиро┐ропрооро┐роХрпНроХ ро╡рпЗрогрпНроЯрпБроорпН роОрой родрооро┐ро┤роХ роЕро░роЪрпБроХрпНроХрпБ роЪрпЖройрпНройрпИ роЙропро░рпН роирпАродро┐рооройрпНро▒роорпН роЙродрпНродро░ро╡ро┐роЯрпНроЯрпБро│рпНро│родрпБ.
- Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar granted time until October 17 for the submission of the medical reports from the Institute of Mental Health at Kilpauk, Chennai, after a thorough examination of the convict PU. Venkatesan, a former loco pilot.The first suo motu contempt of court proceedings against him were initiated in 2020 for his Facebook post containing scandalous allegations against certain Supreme Court and district judges. After the initiation of the proceedings, he began writing letters to judges.When Justices M.S. Ramesh and Sunder Mohan summoned him to the court on April 22, 2024, for framing charges in the 2020 suo motu contempt proceedings, he levelled false and frivolous allegations against them and insisted on recording the court proceedings using his mobile phone
- [07/10, 09:32] CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY Online/offline for AIBE
- CBI order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAMH.C.P.Nos.2408 & 2334 of 2024Suo Motu HCP.No.2408 of 2024Suo Motu тАж PetitionerVs.1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anna Nagar Range, Chennai тАУ 600 040.2.The Inspector of Police,All Women Police Station,Anna Nagar,
- Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 609 SC : Metro exporters p ltd & another vs state bank of india : An international funds transfer may be subject to more than one law , an international funds transfer may be either onshore where either payers bank or payees bank is located in country of currency transfer , and offshore where neither bank is located in country of currency of transfer
More
Recent Posts
- роЪро┐ро▒рокрпНрокрпБ рокро│рпНро│ро┐роХро│ро┐ро▓рпН, роЖроЪро┐ро░ро┐ропро░рпН – рооро╛рогро╡ро░рпН ро╡ро┐роХро┐родро╛роЪрпНроЪро╛ро░родрпНродрпИ роиро┐ро░рпНрогропро┐родрпНродрпБ роХрпКро│рпНроХрпИ роорпБроЯро┐ро╡рпЖроЯрпБродрпНродрпБ, рооро╛рогро╡ро░рпНроХро│рпИ роХро╡ройро┐роХрпНроХ рокрпЛродрпБрооро╛рой роЖроЪро┐ро░ро┐ропро░рпНроХро│рпИ роиро┐ропрооро┐роХрпНроХ ро╡рпЗрогрпНроЯрпБроорпН роОрой родрооро┐ро┤роХ роЕро░роЪрпБроХрпНроХрпБ роЪрпЖройрпНройрпИ роЙропро░рпН роирпАродро┐рооройрпНро▒роорпН роЙродрпНродро░ро╡ро┐роЯрпНроЯрпБро│рпНро│родрпБ.
- Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar granted time until October 17 for the submission of the medical reports from the Institute of Mental Health at Kilpauk, Chennai, after a thorough examination of the convict PU. Venkatesan, a former loco pilot.The first suo motu contempt of court proceedings against him were initiated in 2020 for his Facebook post containing scandalous allegations against certain Supreme Court and district judges. After the initiation of the proceedings, he began writing letters to judges.When Justices M.S. Ramesh and Sunder Mohan summoned him to the court on April 22, 2024, for framing charges in the 2020 suo motu contempt proceedings, he levelled false and frivolous allegations against them and insisted on recording the court proceedings using his mobile phone
- [07/10, 09:32] CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY Online/offline for AIBE
- CBI order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAMH.C.P.Nos.2408 & 2334 of 2024Suo Motu HCP.No.2408 of 2024Suo Motu тАж PetitionerVs.1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Anna Nagar Range, Chennai тАУ 600 040.2.The Inspector of Police,All Women Police Station,Anna Nagar,
- Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) DRTC 609 SC : Metro exporters p ltd & another vs state bank of india : An international funds transfer may be subject to more than one law , an international funds transfer may be either onshore where either payers bank or payees bank is located in country of currency transfer , and offshore where neither bank is located in country of currency of transfer